<
Whistle Blower attorneys located in Atlanta Georgia but handles nationwide recoveries and law suits of Whistle Blower, Whistle Blower Attorneys, Whistle Blower Recoveries, Whistle Blower Attorneys Florida, Whistle Blower Lawyers, Whistle Blower Lawyer, Medicaid Fraud Whistle Blower Attorneys, Houston, Whistle Blower Land, Whistle Blower Pleadings, Whistle Blower Suits, Ca Whistle Blower, Whistle Blower Lawsuit, Whistle Blower Actions, Whistle Blower, Whistle Blowers, Whistle Blower Attorneys, Whistle Blower Attorney, Atlanta Whistle Blower Attorneys, Georgia Whistle Blower Attorneys, Atlanta Whistle Blower Lawyers, Georgia Whistle Blower Lawyers, Alaska Whistle Blower Attorneys, Alabama Whistle Blower Attorneys, Arizona Whistle Blower Attorneys, Arkansas Whistle Blower Attorneys, California Whistle Blower Attorneys, Colorado Whistle Blower Attorneys, Connecticut Whistle Blower Attorneys, Delaware Whistle Blower Attorneys, Florida Whistle Blower Attorneys, Hawaii Whistle Blower Attorneys, Idaho Whistle Blower Attorneys, Illinois Whistle Blower Attorneys, Indiana Whistle Blower Attorneys, Iowa Whistle Blower Attorneys, Kansas Whistle Blower Attorneys, Kentucky Whistle Blower Attorneys, Louisiana Whistle Blower Attorneys, Maine Whistle Blower Attorneys, Maryland Whistle Blower Attorneys, Massachusetts Whistle Blower Attorneys, Michigan Whistle Blower Attorneys, Minnesota Whistle Blower Attorneys, Missouri Whistle Blower Attorneys, Mississippi Whistle Blower Attorneys, Montana Whistle Blower Attorneys, Nebraska Whistle Blower Attorneys, Nevada Whistle Blower Attorneys, New Hampshire Whistle Blower Attorneys, New Jersey Whistle Blower Attorneys, New Mexico Whistle Blower Attorneys, New York Whistle Blower Attorneys, North Carolina Whistle Blower Attorneys, North Dakota Whistle Blower Attorneys, Ohio Whistle Blower Attorneys, Oklahoma Whistle Blower Attorneys, Oregon Whistle Blower Attorneys, Pennsylvania Whistle Blower Attorneys, Rhode Island Whistle Blower Attorneys, South Carolina Whistle Blower Attorneys, South Dakota Whistle Blower Attorneys, Tennessee Whistle Blower Attorneys, Texas Whistle Blower Attorneys, Utah Whistle Blower Attorneys, Vermont Whistle Blower Attorneys, Virginia Whistle Blower Attorneys, Washington Whistle Blower Attorneys, Washington DC Whistle Blower Attorneys, District of Columbia Whistle Blower Attorneys, West Virginia Whistle Blower Attorneys, Wisconsin Whistle Blower Attorneys, Wyoming Whistle Blower Attorneys, Albany Whistle Blower Attorneys, Albuquerque Whistle Blower Attorneys, Allentown Whistle Blower Attorneys, Anchorage Whistle Blower Attorneys, Annapolis Whistle Blower Attorneys, Ann Arbor Whistle Blower Attorneys, Asheville Whistle Blower Attorneys, Atlantic City Whistle Blower Attorneys, Austin Whistle Blower Attorneys, Bakersfield Whistle Blower Attorneys, Baltimore Whistle Blower Attorneys, Baton Rouge Whistle Blower Attorneys, Birmingham Whistle Blower Attorneys, Boise Whistle Blower Attorneys, Boston Whistle Blower Attorneys, Branson Whistle Blower Attorneys, Bridgeport Whistle Blower Attorneys, Brownsville Whistle Blower Attorneys, Buffalo Whistle Blower Attorneys, Burlington Whistle Blower Attorneys, Cape Cities Whistle Blower Attorneys, Cape May Whistle Blower Attorneys, Charleston Whistle Blower Attorneys, Charlotte Whistle Blower Attorneys, Cherry Hill Whistle Blower Attorneys, Chicago Whistle Blower Attorneys, Cincinnati Whistle Blower Attorneys, Cleveland Whistle Blower Attorneys, Colorado Springs Whistle Blower Attorneys, Columbus Whistle Blower Attorneys, Corpus Christi Whistle Blower Attorneys, Dallas Whistle Blower Attorneys, Denver Whistle Blower Attorneys, Des Moines Whistle Blower Attorneys, Detroit Whistle Blower Attorneys, El Paso Whistle Blower Attorneys, Fresno Whistle Blower Attorneys, Ft. Lauderdale Whistle Blower Attorneys, Ft. Myers Whistle Blower Attorneys, Ft Wayne Whistle Blower Attorneys, Ft Worth Whistle Blower Attorneys, Gainesville Whistle Blower Attorneys, Grand Rapids Whistle Blower Attorneys, Green Bay Whistle Blower Attorneys, Gulf Cities Whistle Blower Attorneys, Harrisburg Whistle Blower Attorneys, Hartford Whistle Blower Attorneys, Honolulu Whistle Blower Attorneys, Hot Springs Whistle Blower Attorneys, Houston Whistle Blower Attorneys, Hudson Valley Whistle Blower Attorneys, Huntsville Whistle Blower Attorneys, Indianapolis Whistle Blower Attorneys, Jackson Whistle Blower Attorneys, Jacksonville Whistle Blower Attorneys, Kansas City Whistle Blower Attorneys, Kauai Whistle Blower Attorneys, Lake Placid Whistle Blower Attorneys, Lake Tahoe Whistle Blower Attorneys, Las Vegas Whistle Blower Attorneys, Lexington Whistle Blower Attorneys, Lincoln Whistle Blower Attorneys, Little Rock Whistle Blower Attorneys, Long Beach Whistle Blower Attorneys, Long Branch Whistle Blower Attorneys, Long Island Whistle Blower Attorneys, Los Angeles Whistle Blower Attorneys, Louisville Whistle Blower Attorneys, Madison Whistle Blower Attorneys, Manchester Whistle Blower Attorneys, Maui Whistle Blower Attorneys, Memphis Whistle Blower Attorneys, Miami Whistle Blower Attorneys, Milwaukee Whistle Blower Attorneys, Minneapolis Whistle Blower Attorneys, Mobile Whistle Blower Attorneys, Monterey Whistle Blower Attorneys, Nashville Whistle Blower Attorneys, Newark Whistle Blower Attorneys, New Brunswick Whistle Blower Attorneys, New Orleans Whistle Blower Attorneys, New York City Whistle Blower Attorneys, Niagara Falls Whistle Blower Attorneys, Norfolk Whistle Blower Attorneys, Oakland Whistle Blower Attorneys, Ogden Whistle Blower Attorneys, Oklahoma City Whistle Blower Attorneys, Omaha Whistle Blower Attorneys, Orange Co Whistle Blower Attorneys, Orlando Whistle Blower Attorneys, Outer Banks Whistle Blower Attorneys, Palm Springs Whistle Blower Attorneys, Pensacola Whistle Blower Attorneys, Philadelphia Whistle Blower Attorneys, Phoenix Whistle Blower Attorneys, Pittsburgh Whistle Blower Attorneys, Pocono's Whistle Blower Attorneys, Portland Whistle Blower Attorneys, Providence Whistle Blower Attorneys, Provo Valley Whistle Blower Attorneys, Raleigh Whistle Blower Attorneys, Reno Whistle Blower Attorneys, Richmond Whistle Blower Attorneys, River Cities Whistle Blower Attorneys, Riverside Whistle Blower Attorneys, Roanoke Whistle Blower Attorneys, Rochester MN Whistle Blower Attorneys, Rochester NY Whistle Blower Attorneys, Sacramento Whistle Blower Attorneys, Salt Lake City Whistle Blower Attorneys, San Antonio Whistle Blower Attorneys, San Diego Whistle Blower Attorneys, San Francisco Whistle Blower Attorneys, San Jose Whistle Blower Attorneys, San Juan Whistle Blower Attorneys, Santa Barbara Whistle Blower Attorneys, Santa Fe Whistle Blower Attorneys, Seattle Whistle Blower Attorneys, Spokane Whistle Blower Attorneys, St Louis Whistle Blower Attorneys, St Paul Whistle Blower Attorneys, St Petersburg Whistle Blower Attorneys, Sun Valley Whistle Blower Attorneys, Syracuse Whistle Blower Attorneys, Tallahassee Whistle Blower Attorneys, Tampa Bay Whistle Blower Attorneys, Trenton Whistle Blower Attorneys, Tucson Whistle Blower Attorneys, Tulsa Whistle Blower Attorneys, Virginia Beach Whistle Blower Attorneys, Washington Whistle Blower Attorneys, Westchester Co Whistle Blower Attorneys, West Palm Beach Whistle Blower Attorneys, Wichita Whistle Blower Attorneys, Winston Salem Whistle Blower Attorneys
Bothwell Bracker & Vann


Home
Attorneys
Free Evaluation
Are You Protected
How to choose a lawyer About the Law FCA Statute Resources Visit Our Blawg Contact Us
 

Link to Taxpayers Against Fraud

Link to Qui Tam Whistleblower Blog

Many qui tam relator whistleblowers struggle with choosing a lawyer or a law firm to advise them or to prosecute their case.  Choosing the right lawyer is only slightly less important than having a good case.  Some of the issues that should be considered are:

  1. How much real experience does the law firm have in False Claims Act litigation?

    Many law firms advertise or otherwise indicate that they do FCA litigation in order to obtain clients in a relatively new field for the firm.  Many lawyers who have even had a case or two might indicate that they have qui tam or FCA experience.  However, what sets Bothwell Bracker & Vann apart is that Bothwell Bracker & Vann has been a pioneer in the field and has litigated every aspect of the False Claims Act.  Some firms have had a case or two where the government intervened and did the real litigation.  While this exposed the firm lawyers to the FCA, it did not give them the breadth of experience for the cases where the government does not intervene or does not do all the work.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann provides the same in-depth legal service whether the government intervenes or not.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann has taken several cases to the pre-trial stage of litigation and has handled numerous appeals.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann does not also do general practice litigation, plaintiff’s injury work, criminal defense or other specialties that take away from the focus and experience in the FCA that this very unique area of law requires. 

  2. What happens if the government does not take the case?

    Many law firms that have experience in FCA litigation will not keep your case if the government declines it.  This happens with equal or greater regularity if the law firm does not have FCA experience.  This is known as the lottery ticket mentality, where some lawyers believe that they can pitch a case to the government and when the government intervenes and runs the case, the lawyer and the client can punch a lottery ticket of winnings.  This has worked for law firms in the past, which is why some advertise FCA litigation experience they do not truly have.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann has been working in this area long enough to know that the real declination rate at the outset of the case is over 90%--which means that more than 9 out of every 10 people who think they have an undeniable case get an initial declination by the government.  Then they lose their legal representation and are left to get new lawyers quickly or get thrown out of court. 

    That does not happen with Bothwell Bracker & Vann as we take cases on the merits and not based on a lottery ticket mentality.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann knows that declinations can depend on political reasons as well as resource allocation issues, and most of the time, it has little to do with the relative merits of the case.  Because of its hard work, Bothwell Bracker & Vann has been able to convince the government to intervene in cases at a later date and has been able to assist the government in prosecuting cases when the government’s theory or evidence has evaporated during litigation.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann has gotten millions of dollars in settlements where the government could not invest resources due to an initial estimate of value in the thousands of dollars.  Because of the firm’s experience and added value in litigation, government lawyers have offered Bothwell Bracker & Vann clients the maximum relator’s share in both intervened (25% ) and non intervened (30%) cases where the national average is usually around 16%.

  3. Does the attention paid the client vary with the relative size of the case?

    The relationship between a plaintiff and his or her attorney is often more than a business relationship.  However, a qui tam relator whistleblower has unique relationship issues that not even all experienced FCA practitioners fully understand.  Many law firms provide different levels of service depending on the anticipated size of the case, with some firms jettisoning clients as the anticipated value dips below a pre-designated cut-off point.  While larger and more complex cases demand more attorney time, Bothwell Bracker & Vann tries to make client relations uniform across cases as noted in some of the client comments below. 

    The average False Claims Act case takes a great deal of time from beginning to end.  The cases are filed under seal and remain under seal until the government finishes its investigation or until the court stops granting extensions.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann has had cases under seal for up to ten years and expects that any given case may be under seal for several years.  Even if the case is unsealed rather quickly, the litigation can often last several years on its own. Therefore, the relationship between attorney and client needs to be one that can last through long years of hard fought litigation.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann works hard to maintain very good client relations and its attorneys always remember who they are working for. 

  4. What happens if the government becomes adversarial?

    Many potential whistleblowers are overly confident that as soon as the government or the defendant hears what they have to say the matter will be quickly resolved.  Sadly, national statistics do not support that theory.  However, because many whistleblowers cannot imagine that the government could be adversarial to their cause, they do not ask potential lawyers what would happen if the government became adversarial.  The answer from most firms is that they would back down in deference to the government and leave the client unrepresented. 

    One of the earliest published cases after the 1986 amendments should give all whistleblowers reason to ask potential lawyers the question of what happens if the government becomes adversarial.
    It is instead the very concept of “whistleblowers” that appears to be in issue.  The pattern of behavior in these cases by the Department of Justice always has been a mystery.  The use of a qui tam plaintiff is nothing new. . . .  In view of their widespread use, it is worthy of note that the Department of Justice has considered such individuals as adversaries rather than allies.  This is not the first case where this Court has noted the antagonism of the Justice Department to a whistleblower.  The reason continues to be unknown, but the attitude is clear.
    U.S. v. G.E., 808 F. Supp. 580, 583-84 (S.D. Oh. 1992) (footnote omitted).  Bothwell Bracker & Vann is one of the only firms with experience in dealing with a government lawyer antagonistic to the case.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann has rarely had to litigate matters between the government and a qui tam relator.  However, it is important to know that a law firm has that experience if needed.  Indeed, Bothwell Bracker & Vann has settled a case for millions of dollars where the government initially threatened to dismiss the case with prejudice based solely on an ex parte communication from the defendants’ lawyer.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann has litigated cases where government attorneys settled for tens of millions of dollars the case brought by the whistleblower and refused to pay the statutorily required relator’s share.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann has litigated a matter where the government failed to adequately investigate a case and, for political expediency, pushed a quick, small settlement.  The 1986 amendments to the FCA were intended to make the relator a full participant in the matter until it is fully and adequately resolved.  The FCA also intends to guarantee a full relator’s share.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann represents relators’ interests even where they occasionally conflict with government positions. 

REPRESENTATIVE CLIENT COMMENTS

“I searched long and hard for the right attorneys to take my case and I am glad I did.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann has represented me in my FCA case against Lockheed for over a decade.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann attorneys and staff have shown a dedication and diligence on my case that I can hardly believe possible.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann attorneys believed in my case when it felt like I was taking on the whole world by myself.  They became as much friends and supporters as attorneys, but they absolutely know what they are doing with qui tam cases.  I am sure I wouldn’t have survived the ordeal if it weren’t for the competence and compassion of the Bothwell Bracker & Vann attorneys and staff.”  Larry W. Wilson

“I feel like my case has been unique because I have had to fight both the company that cheated Medicare and the government that settled my case for over $30 million.  I am fortunate that while my case has been unusual, has already lasted a decade, and has been to the court of appeals twice, my attorneys at Bothwell Bracker & Vann have been equal to the task in dedication, tenacity and know how.  Without Bothwell Bracker & Vann, my case would have been over long ago.  I can’t say enough good things about the attorneys and paralegals at Bothwell Bracker & Vann.”  Sean Bledsoe

“My cases with Bothwell Bracker & Vann were very well represented.  I found the attorneys to be accessible and approachable.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann attorneys were very familiar with the legal process and how to bring the case to closure.”  Jeffery R. Clausen

“Bothwell Bracker & Vann has taken very good care of me and my case on every point.  Bothwell Bracker & Vann stood by us when no one else would.  My wife and I agree that the attorneys at Bothwell Bracker & Vann are the best lawyers there are and we recommend them to anyone who asks.”  Donald E. Howard

I had a great experience under very difficult circumstances in large part because I felt very comfortable with Bothwell Bracker & Vann attorneys’ knowledge of the qui tam law.  Karon E. O’Brien


Bothwell Bracker & Vann PC
304 Macy Drive Roswell, Georgia 30076
1.888.643.1606 | info@BBV-Law.com

Site designed and maintained by Simply Bella Web Design, Inc.